It is sometimes desirable to control the ice regime
in order to eliminate or lessen the impacts of ice related problems. These
problems include ice jam flooding, the loss of hydroelectric power production,
the blockage of navigable channels, and damage to hydraulic structures.
Examples of various control measures are provided in this section.
Ice jam mitigation includes those measures done
to eliminate or lessen the problems that may occur due to the formation
or release of an ice jam. Considerable understanding of the ice regime,
is required in the implementation of any of the following mitigation techniques.
Fixed structures are used to stabilize an ice cover
or prevent the downstream movement of broken ice. Stabilization of an
ice cover prevents its premature breakup thus increasing the chances of
the ice melting in place, while at the same time the retention of moving
ice floes reduces the supply of ice to potential downstream ice jam locations.
Fixed structures must be designed to withstand applied
forces. The forces include the impact of moving ice floes and the thermal
expansion of ice sheets. Physical hydraulic modelling may be required
during the design and installation of fixed structures to control ice
(Perham, 1984).
Groins and jetties can be used to constrict the channel
width (Cumming-Cockburn & Associates Limited, 1986) in order to promote
"bridging" of ice floes during freeze-up and to raise upstream
water levels thereby improving the upstream hydraulic conditions for ice
cover stability. Such structures also create a storage place for ice floes
at breakup, thus reducing the volume of ice moving downstream.
An ice control dam obstructs the passage of ice in order
to prevent ice jam formation downstream (Michel, 1971). Depending on the
available reservoir storage in relation to the spring flood magnitude,
it may be possible for the flood control structure to retain all contributing
upstream ice until it eventually melts. More commonly, however, the available
storage is only sufficient to delay the passage of weaker ice. Ice control
structures may, however, initiate ice jams near the upstream limit of
the headpond since the momentum of moving ice is arrested considerably
by stronger headpond ice and a significant reduction in the hydraulic
gradient. An ice control dam does provide high reliability with minimal
monitoring and operational requirements; however, other environmental
or economic realities may preclude its use.
Weirs are low-head overflow dams built across a
stream to raise upstream water levels to create suitable conditions for
formation of a stable ice cover or for the accumulation of frazil ice
or ice pans. Properly designed weirs can provide reliable control of ice
at suitable sites on small rivers during both the freeze-up and breakup
periods.
Ice booms are installed across a watercourse to
control the movement of ice. They can be used to reduce the supply of
ice to downstream jamming sites by restricting the movement of upstream
ice and prolonging the period of ice discharge. Ice booms are most commonly
used, however, to stabilize or retain an upstream ice cover where velocities
are less than 0.6 m/s or Froude numbers are less than 0.08. Ice booms
usually consist of timbers shackled together by chains and held together
by cables anchored to the river bed. Pier-mounted booms can also be constructed.
For example, the Montreal ice control structure uses floating steel booms
or stop logs placed between fixed concrete piers to collect ice floes
and to help stabilize the ice cover earlier in winter than otherwise would
be the case.
Research and observations (Calkins et al., 1976) reveal
that ice jams tend to form at sites where there are: surface obstructions,
river bends, river channel slope changes, constrictions, low velocity
pools and shallow river sections.
Channel modifications can be carried out in order to reduce
the likelihood of ice jams. Such modifications include the removal of
constrictions and surface obstructions such as piles, old bridge piers,
and natural islands as well as the removal of sand and gravel bars. Channel
diversions can also be constructed to by-pass an obstruction to ice and
water flow. However, channel modifications should be evaluated on a site-specific
basis.
In New Brunswick, a permit must be obtained before
an alteration is made to the bed or banks of a watercourse. Projects are
reviewed in order to protect individuals or structures, as well as fish
habitat and the environment, which may be affected by the alteration.
Dusting is the spreading of a thin layer of a dark
substance over an ice cover in order to weaken it because of increased
heat absorption. The dusting material could be sand, fly ash, or another
dark substance that is environmentally safe.
Dusting can be done for the purpose of preventing the
occurence of an ice jam at sites of known ice jamming or near highly developed
flood prone areas. Dusting is not effective on rough ice surfaces such
as ice jams since the heat absorption property of such surfaces is very
low.
The timing of dusting operations is very important.
If it is done too early, it could be covered by a late snowfall which
would reduce its effectiveness. If attempted too late, the ice could become
too weak and unsafe to allow the spreading of the dusting material, or
the ice could breakup and jam before the dusting material takes effect.
Blasting may be used to break an ice cover into
floes which can be transported by the water downstream or to weaken a
solid ice cover prior to the arrival of upstream ice. The explosive charge
is usually placed in the water underneath the ice. A much greater charge
would be required if it is placed on or within the ice.
Properly placed explosives may be used for removing ice
jams by blasting the ice sheet holding the jam in place. The ideal time
to release a jam is just after it has formed. If the flow has dropped,
blasting the jam will be ineffective due to the lack of sufficient water
to carry the loosened ice downstream.
Blasting ice jams is rarely effective and is dangerous
to the blasting crew and neighbouring property. The placement of an explosive
charge is dangerous work that must only be performed by trained personnel.
Adequate safety, rescue and first aid measures should be in place before
the commencement of work.
Ice cutting refers to the cutting, sawing, or splitting
of an ice cover to cause it to melt faster or to break it into smaller
pieces that will be transported more readily when water levels rise. Ice
cutting can only be done if the ice cover is strong enough to support
cutting machinery and crews.
The City of Ottawa has a program of cutting and blasting
ice in the Rideau River to prevent the formation of ice jams. Strips of
about 15 - 20 m wide are cut where the ice has a tendency to remain solid.
Then crews drill and blast the ice at the downstream end prior to the
arrival of spring flows.
Ice cutting has also been done to prevent ice jams
in the Beaurivage River near Quebec City. Ice cutting has many advantages
over blasting techniques; it breaks more ice than blasting, it is only
one-third the cost, has no environmental impacts and is generally safer.
For small streams accessible from the banks, it
may be possible to remove ice using construction equipment, such as back
hoes and drag lines, before ice jams form. The efficient and safe removal
of ice depends, in part, upon the equipment operator whose judgement must
be exercised as ice removal operations progress.
The adhesion of supercooled frazil ice to structures
(trash racks, hydraulic gates, etc.) is another major problem. Several
solutions to this problem exist.
One approach is to heat the surface to which ice adheres.
This can be accomplished by applying steam or warm water to the affected
area, or by incorporating electrical resistance or steam/hot water heating
within the structure. Usually the objective is to keep the surface temperature
above the freezing point so that ice will not adhere to it.
Another approach is to use construction materials
and coatings to which ice bonds weakly so that it can be easily removed.
One coating that has been effective is a plastic type liner made from
a copolymer solution of toulene and silicone oil (Ashton 1986).
There is little or no inland navigation on New Brunswick
rivers during the ice season, with the exception of ferry operations across
rivers and limited penetration of ocean-going vessels into river estuaries.
Icebreakers are commonly used to control river ice for the purpose of
navigation.
Air bubbler systems can also be effective in preventing
the growth of a solid ice cover at navigation locks, port facilities and
ferry crossings, but are impractical for long river reaches. In a bubbler
system, an air-driven warm water jet is directed upward to melt or suppress
the growth of river ice. The plume of warm flowing water created by the
rising air bubbles spreads as it rises and melts the ice cover (Ashton,
1986). The most important requirement for successful performance of an
air bubbler system is a supply of warmer water near the channel bed (U.S.
Department of the Army, 1982).
Acres International Ltd. (1980), "Behavior
of Ice Covers Subject to Large Daily Flow and Level Fluctuations",
for the Canadian Electrical Association.
Ashton, G.D. (1983), "First Generation Model of Ice
Deterioration", Proc. of Conference on Frontiers in Hydraulic Engineering,
ASCE, New York, pp. 273-278.
Ashton, G.D. (1986), "River and Lake Ice Engineering",
Water Resources Publications, Littleton, Colorado, U.S.A.
Beltaos, S. and Krishnappan B.B. (1982), "Surges
from Ice Jam Releases: A Case Study", Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering,
Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 276-284.
Beltaos, S. (1983), "River Ice Jams: Theory, Case
Studies and Applications", Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE,Vol.
109, No. 10, pp. 1338-1359.
Beltaos, S. (1984), "Study of River Ice Breakup using
Hydrometric Station Records", Proceedings Workshop on the Hydraulics
of River Ice, Fredericton, N.B., Canada, pp. 41-59.
Beltaos, S. (1989), "Initial Fracture and Breakup
of River Ice Cover", National Water Research Institute, Burlington,
Ontario.
Bilello, M.A. (1980), "Maximum Thickness and Subsequent
Decay of Lake, River and Fast Sea Ice in Canada and Alaska", U.S.
Army CRREL Report 80-6, Hanover, N.H.
Bulatov, S.N. (1972), "Computation of the Strength
of the Melting Ice Cover of Rivers and Reservoirs and Forecasting of the
Time of its Erosion", Proc. Symposium on the Role of Snow and Ice
in Hydrology, Banff, Canada, pp. 575-580.
Burrell, B.C.,Tang,P.W., Lane, R., and Beltaos, S. (1986),
"Study of Ice Breakup in the Meduxnekeag River, N.B., Using Hydrometric
Station Records", Proc., Fourth Workshop on Hydraulics of River Ice,
Montreal.
Calkins, D.J., Hulton, M.S. and Marlar, T.L. (1976), "Analysis
of Potential Ice Jam Sites on the Connecticut River at Windsor, Vermont",
Report 76-31, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers. Hanover, New Hampshire.
Cumming-Cockburn & Associates Ltd. (1986), "Ice
Jams on Small Rivers, Remedial Measures and Monitoring", Willowdale,
Ontario.
Desplanque, C. and Bray, D.I. (1984), "Winter Regime
in the Tidal Estuaries of the Northern Portion of the Bay of Fundy, N.B.",
Proceedings Workshop on Hydraulics of River Ice, Fredericton, N.B.
Devik,O. (1964), "Present Experience on Ice Problems
Connected with the Utilization of Water Power in Norway", Journal
of the International Association of Hydraulic Research, vol. 2, no. 1,
pp. 25-40.
Ferrick, M., Lemieux G., Mulherin N. and Dement W (1986),
"Controlled River Ice Cover Breakup, Part 1. Hudson River Field Experiements",
IAHR Symposium on Ice, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Henderson, F.M. and Gerard R. (1981), "Flood Waves
Caused by Ice Jam Formation and Failure", Proceedings IAHR Symposium
on Ice, Quebec, Canada, Vol. 1, pp. 277-287.
Le Brun-Salonen, M.L. (1983), "Average Solid Ice
Thickness in New Brunswick Rivers", Report No. 2.03, Prepared under
the New Employment Expansion Development Program, Fredericton, N.B.
Matousek, V. (1984), "Regularity of the Freezing-up
of the Water Surface and Heat Exchange Between Water Body and Water Surface",
IAHR Ice Symposium Proceedings, Hamburg.
Michel, B. (1971), "Winter Regime of Rivers and Lakes",
U.S. Army CRREL Monograph 111-B1a, Hanover, N.H.
Michel, B. (1978), "Ice Mechanics", Les Presses
de l'Universite Laval, Quebec, Canada.
Newbury, R.W. (1968), "The Nelson River: A Study
of Subarctic River Processes", Ph.D. Thesis. John Hopkins University.
Pariset, E., Hausser R.and Gagnon A. (1966), "Formation
of Ice Covers and Ice Jams in Rivers", Journal of the Hydraulics
Division, ASCE, Vol. 92 (HY6), pp. 1-24.
Perham R.E. (1984), "Ice Sheet Retention Structures",
Proceedings of the IAHR Ice Symposium, International Association for Hydraulic
Research, Hamburg, West Germany. Vol. I, pp. 339-348.
Prowse, T.D., Anderson, J.C. and Smith R.L. (1986), "Discharge
Measurement During River Ice Breakup", Proc. 43rd Eastern Snow Conference,
Hanover, New Hampshire, pp. 55-69.
Prowse, T.D. (1987), "Monograph on River Ice Jams,
River Ice Processes", Submitted to NRCC Working Group on River Ice
Jams.
Shen, H.T., Foltyn E.P. and Daly S.F. (1984), "Forecasting
Water Temperature Decline and Freeze-up in Rivers", U.S. Army, CRREL
Report 84-19, Hanover, N.H.
Sherstone, D.A. (1980), "Photogrammetric Measurement
of Discharge in Ice-choked Northern Streams During Spring Breakup"
M.A. Thesis, Department of Geography, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.
Shulyakovskii, L.G. (1963), "Manual of Forecasting
Ice Formation for Rivers and Inland Lakes", Israel Program for Scientific
Translations, Jerusalem.
Tang, P.W. and Davar K.S. (1984), "Forecasting the
Initiation of Ice Breakup on the Nashwaak River, N.B.", Proc. Workshop
on Hydraulics of River Ice, Fredericton, N.B., pp. 65-93.
U.S. Department of the Army (1982), "Ice Engineering",
Engineers Manual, Corps of Engineers, Washington, D.C.
Watson, S.A. (1988), "Interpreting River Ice Breakup
History from Photogrammetric Measurements of Ice Jams in the Liard-Mackenzie
Rivers, Northwest Territories", M.Sc. Thesis, Watershed Ecosystems
Program, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario.