The collection, use and disclosure
of personal health information should occur only when an individual
consents and knows what they are consenting to. This respects
the individual’s privacy and recognizes
that their information belongs to them
If an individual gives formal written or verbal permission,
it’s called express consent.
It is the clearest statement of one’s wishes, but may
be very difficult to obtain quickly enough in some situations.
Many Canadian provinces also use another model called implied
knowledgeable consent to collect and use personal
health information when providing health care and treatment.
Implied knowledgeable consent exists when an individual knows:
why
their personal health information would be collected/used/disclosed,
and they
can provide or withhold consent.
Should implied knowledgeable consent
be the “standard” in New Brunswick’s new legislation
for providing health care?
Should express consent be required in
other situations?
What might these be, and why?
Uses without consent
Other jurisdictions also provide that in certain circumstances,
the collection, use and disclosure of personal health information
is permitted without an individual’s
express or implied consent.
These circumstances include: Minimizing
or averting a health or safety risk Assisting
in a criminal investigation or on a court order Determining
an individual’s eligibility to receive health services Complying
with a law of New Brunswick or Canada Planning,
monitoring and evaluating the health system Educating
health service provider
Should the collection, use and disclosure of personal health
information sometimes be allowed without a person’s consent?
In what circumstances?