|New Brunswick Conflict of Interest Commissioner
Conflict of Interest Bulletins
Issue No.1 - May 2000
To: Members of the Legislative Assembly
From: Hon. Stuart G. Stratton, Q.C.
This is the first of what I plan to be a series of bulletins dealing with various issues that arise under the Members' Conflict of Interest Act.
In this first issue, I remind you of the background to the new Act, its purpose and highlight some of its requirements. I also remind you of your obligation to file your disclosure documents with me on or before July 1, 2000.
I wish also to remind you that I am available to all of you to provide advice and assistance in meeting your obligations under the Act.
SOME HISTORY WITH RESPECT TO THE ORIGIN OF THE MEMBERS' CONFLICT OF INTEREST ACT
In 1978, the New Brunswick Government enacted one of the first Conflict of Interest Acts in Canada. The purpose of that Act was to assist legislative members, and others, to avoid an actual or apparent conflict of interest. In addition to Members of the Legislature and Cabinet Ministers, the Act applied as well to Deputy Ministers, executive staff members and heads of Crown Corporations. That Act required all of these people to make full disclosure of assets and liabilities by filing a sworn declaration with a designated Judge of the Court of Queen's Bench.
Some fifteen years later, in response to what had been described as an unprecedented level of cynicism and lack of trust in politicians, revisions have been made to most of the Conflict of Interest Acts in Canada in an effort to put into place a regime that will better avoid conflict of interest situations. Several of the revised acts, like the one in New Brunswick, now have application to Members only and provide for the appointment of a Commissioner from outside government or the courts, (in some instances referred to as Ethics Commissioners), to administer the Act.
Historically, in 1997, the Government of New Brunswick retained the Honourable William L.M. Creaghan, a retired Judge of the Court of Queen's Bench, to review comparable conflict legislation in other provinces and to consult with those affected by the provisions of our legislation. In June of 1997, Justice Creaghan produced a report entitled "Review and Recommendations of William L.M. Creaghan on the New Brunswick Conflict of Interest Act." Copies of Justice Creaghan's Report have been made available to you by Mrs. Loredana Catalli Sonier, Clerk of the Legislative Assembly.
Following receipt of Justice Creaghan's Report, the Legislative Assembly referred the report to the Legislative Administration Committee. After a year of meetings and discussions, that Committee produced a report dated December 18, 1998. A copy of that report has, as well, been forwarded to you by Mrs. Catalli Sonier.
Following the Legislative Administration Committee's Report on March 12, 1999, the Legislative Assembly of New Brunswick enacted the new Members' Conflict of Interest Act. The Act has since been proclaimed to be in effect as of May 1, 2000. I forwarded copies of the new Act to all Members of the Legislature with my letter of May 1, 2000.
THE PURPOSE OF THE MEMBERS' CONFLICT OF INTEREST ACT
When introducing the new Members' Conflict of Interest Act in the New Brunswick Legislature on March 9, 1999 the then Minister of Justice said:
Since my appointment to the Office of Commissioner, I have read several statements concerning the purpose behind the enactment of Conflict of Interest Acts and Conflict Codes. Let me quote what some authors have said about the purpose of the new legislation.
OTHER CONFLICT OF INTEREST ACTS
There are Conflict of Interest Statutes in all of the provinces of Canada, the Yukon, and the Northwest Territories. A Conflict of Interest Act for the new territory of Nunavut is under study. I should inform you as well, that many of the provisions contained in the New Brunswick legislation are patterned upon the Revised Acts in Ontario, Alberta and British Columbia.
THE OFFICE OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST COMMISSIONER
The Office of the Conflict of Interest Commissioner opened on May 1, 2000. The Commission is located in the former Office of the Lieutenant-Governor in Edgecombe House at 736 King Street. The office telephone number is 457-7890. The fax number is 444-5224. The e-mail address is email@example.com The office has been established as a part-time position with part-time clerical assistance provided by the staff in the Legislative Assembly Office.
COMMISSIONER'S ADVISORY ROLE
I would express the opinion that one of the most important functions assigned to the Commissioner under the Act relates to the provision of advice. Section 29 of the Act authorizes the Commissioner to give advice and recommendations of general application to Members or former Members respecting their obligations under the Act.
Section 30 of the Act goes even further. That section permits a Member or former Member to seek the written advice of the Commissioner prior to the Member taking actions. If a Member provides all relevant details to the Commissioner and follows the advice of the Commissioner, that Member is protected from any actions under the Act relating to a later request for an investigation into an allegation of a breach relating to the matter on which advice was given.
Please note too that, pursuant to section 30(3), the advice and recommendations of the Commissioner are confidential until released by the Member or former Member or with his or her consent.
SOME SELECTED SECTIONS OF THE ACT
To comply with the requirements of the Act, you must learn all of its provisions. I would, however, highlight the following provisions for your attention:
Section 4 - This section sets out the general intent of the Act. That intent is to prevent conflicts from arising between the execution of a Member's official duties and responsibilities and his or her private interests.
Section 8 - This section has to do with gifts.
Section 8(1) states that a Member shall not accept a fee, gift or personal benefit that is "connected directly or indirectly with the performance of the Member's duties of office." But note that this restriction does not apply in respect of gifts or personal benefits that are received "as an incident of the protocol or social obligation that normally accompany the responsibilities of office." When, however, these latter types of gifts or benefits exceed $250.00 in value, or the total received from any one source exceed this value, the Member must file a "GIFT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT" with me without delay indicating "the nature of the gift or personal benefit, its' source and the circumstances under which it was given and accepted."
Section 13 - This section sets out what must be done when a Member has reasonable grounds to believe that he or she has a conflict of interest in a matter that is before the Assembly or the Executive Council or a Committee of either of them. The Member must disclose the general nature of the conflict of interest and withdraw from the meeting without voting or participating in consideration of the matter.
Section 18 - This section requires each Member of the Legislature to file an annual "PRIVATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT." The disclosure statement must contain "a statement of the nature of the assets, liabilities and financial and business interests of the Member, the Member's spouse and minor children and of private corporations controlled by any of them." A Member must also disclose "any salary, financial assistance or other benefit the Member has received from a Registered Political Party or Registered District Association.
Under section 18(5) of the Act, certain items need not be disclosed on the Private Disclosure Statement. These items include the Member's primary residence, primary recreational property, automobiles owned or controlled, items of domestic, household or personal use or ownership, including cash, non-convertible bonds, trust and bank certificates, registered retirement savings plans which are not self-administered and any property placed in a blind trust.
Section 18(6) mandated that after a Private Disclosure Statement has been filed with me, I must consult with the Member and the Member's spouse, if available, to ensure that adequate disclosure has been made and to provide advice on the Member's obligations under the Act.
Section 18(7) should also be noted. If there is a change in the assets, liabilities or financial or business interests of a Member of his or her spouse and minor children, or any private corporation controlled by any of them which would reasonably be expected to have a significant effect on the information previously disclosed, the Member must file with me a "STATEMENT OF MATERIAL CHANGE" within thirty (30) days of any such change. A form of Material Change Statement was included with the material I sent to you with my letter of May 1, 2000.
Another section of the Act that I would like to bring to your attention is section 20. That section requires me to prepare a "PUBLIC DISCLOSURE STATEMENT" which shall, subject to some exceptions, "state the source and nature, but not the value of the assets, liabilities, and financial and business interests" of each Member as well as "any salary, financial assistance or other benefit the Member has received from a registered political party or a registered district association during the preceding twelve months and any gift or benefit that has been disclosed."
But as I noted, there are exceptions to what must be disclosed in the commissioner's "Public Disclosure Statement." These include:
SOME GENERAL COMMENTS
The Act requires each Member to file a Private Disclosure Statement with the Commissioner on or before July 1, 2000. Only two such statements have been filed with me to date. Should a Member fail to file a Private Disclosure Statement on or before July 1, 2000, I must, subsequent to one written reminder, inform the Speaker of the Member's default. The Speaker must then table my report before the Assembly.
I pause here to point out that in addition to the above, section 41(1) provides that the failure to file a Private Disclosure Statement, a Gift Disclosure Statement or a Statement of Material Change within the time provided by the Act can lead to serious consequences including a reprimand, a monetary penalty, suspension from the Assembly or expulsion.
Other provisions of the Act provide that Members may not:
In addition, Members of the Executive Council must not:
INVESTIGATION AND INQUIRIES
Under section 36 of the Act "ANY PERSON" may request an investigation into allegations of a breach of the Act. Such requests must be in the form of an affidavit setting out the grounds and the nature of the alleged breach. In addition, the Assembly may, by resolution, request that I investigate an alleged breach of the Act by a Member.
On receipt of a request for an investigation, the Commissioner must review the matter and decide whether or not there is jurisdiction under the Act. If there is jurisdiction, the Commissioner must decide whether to conduct an investigation with or without conducting a formal inquiry. The Member against whom an allegation is made must be given reasonable notice of any investigation and be given an opportunity to respond to the allegation.
If the Commissioner is of the opinion that the request is frivolous, vexatious or not made in good faith, or that there are no grounds or insufficient grounds for an investigation, the Commissioner may refuse to conduct an investigation, or may cease the investigation.
Following an investigation, the Commissioner's Report is filed with the Speaker who must lay the Report before the Assembly. The Assembly may either accept or reject the findings of the Commissioner or substitute its own findings and may vary the recommended sanction or impose no sanction. As already noted, the sanctions that may be recommended range from a reprimand to expulsion from the House. The Commissioner may also recommend no sanction if the breach that occurred was trivial or committed through inadvertence or an error in judgment made in good faith.
AN IMPORTANT END-NOTE
Finally, please let me emphasize the obvious. This is a new Act that I have been referring to. In addition, the new forms we have had to prepare to carry forward the provisions of the Act have not yet been tested by experience. Anything new can be a matter of concern to those who must comply with the Act and to those of us who must administer it. My objective will be to assist you in any way I can to ensure that you avoid any conflict of interest as you go about your daily duties and responsibilities as Members of the Legislative Assembly of New Brunswick.
If you have questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to phone me or drop by the office.